Reforming Project Management |
||
|
Thursday, December 09, 2004
Who Do You Want at OSHA?
I think the VPP (Voluntary Protection Plan) efforts will pay off. The program offers real incentives to firms who take the extra effort to qualify for the plan. Unfortunately, not enough firms will go after the VPP. Incremental improvement while desirable will not produce the results we need. It's time to come at this differently. In my mind there's no reason not to make the level of safety improvements MT Hojgaard, Denmark, accomplished when they adopted lean construction. They cut injury rates by about 60% in one year. I want the new OSHA leader to make a commitment to cut injury rates by over 50% in the next two years. What do you want? Read Safety Everyday's construction safety in the news sideblog. Wednesday, December 08, 2004
Interested in Change? Start Using a "To-Don't List"
Organizational change is one of the harder changes to make. It takes leadership, attention, and changes in routines. I prepared today's e-Tip for project managers and project executives who are introducing lean project delivery approaches.
Now, how about some e-Tip proposals from readers. I have pleny of great books that I'm ready to give out. Monday, December 06, 2004
Project Meeting Protocols
Meetings, meetings, meetings...we have far too many that don't produce the value for the attendees or the project. Patrick Lencioni's latest book, Death by Meeting, makes the case for different meeting approaches depending on the purpose pursued. For more than 8 years the founders of the Lean Construction Institute have advised people doing projects on a lean basis to have special-purpose weekly project meetings. Over the next week or so I will offer my proposals for protocols for conducting a series of meetings that address a coherent set of project concerns. I have identified four protocols that are consistent with the Last Planner System®. These four represent distinct phases of the workflow of project work.
I am calling these protocols rather than meeting agendas or processes to indicate there are further design opportunities to address the specific circumstances of your project. However, please consider these meeting descriptions as more than just Hal's good ideas. These protocols represent a collected wisdom from collaborating on projects ranging from defense contracts, construction, architecture, engineering, and software development. While I am sure these protocols can be improved upon, I am also quite confident in their usefulness just as is. Stay tuned... Visit the Archives for more postings |
Reference Papers
|
|||||
|
| ||||||