Project Reformer  Reforming Project Management

A Teleconference
Series Book



Subscribe with Bloglines
Don't miss a posting.
Join over 1095 other people who Subscribe to Reforming Project Management
Enter your email:

powered by Bloglet

Spread the word
TELL A FRIEND
Enter friend's e-mail:


Search this weblog


CoachBlog? Top 25 Business Coaches!

Google News Alerts

< # Blogrollers ? >

< # bostonites ? >

Featured in Seth Godin's
Bull Market 2004


Thursday, September 09, 2004
 
Let's Hear a Big "Woo Hoo" for OSHA

OSHA announced a plan to offer the Voluntary Protection Plan (VPP) to a broad group in the construction industry. Previously only owners, general contractors, and projects of a long duration could qualify for a VPP. OSHA is recognizing that subcontractors and general contractors that do short projects can make a significant difference on the safety on a jobsite. They have published a set of guidelines and are asking for comments before going forward with those guidelines. The due date for comments is November 1, 2004.

Here's the draft Notice of VPPC program. Go here to leave a comment for OSHA.

I need to spend more time reading through the proposal before I offer my comments. I'll share those here at the same time I send them to OSHA. In the meantime, I urge you to read the draft document and send your comments to OSHA. The VPPC is perhaps the most important initiative OSHA has taken for the construction industry in the last 10 years. OSHA put it this way in the draft document:

"In calendar year 2002, construction companies accounted for an estimated six percent of total private sector employment, but almost nine percent of total work-related recordable injuries and illnesses. There were 1,121 work-related fatalities involving construction work, more than 20 percent of the private sector's 5,524 fatalities reported during that year."

I will comment on the program proposal in more detail over the next weeks. Please join me in getting behind this important initiative. Based on the success of VPP in other industries the VPPC is sure to make a significant contribution to the safety of our friends and colleagues.

Read Safety Everyday's construction safety in the news sideblog.

Wednesday, September 08, 2004
 
Project e-Tip: Take the Time to Plan Outcomes before Activity

I've been attending many project meetings lately. They all had one thing in common. People spoke about what they would be doing without talking about what that would accomplish. Planning starts with the promises you make. Once you get clear about what you will accomplish, then what you do becomes clear.

The Project Reformer's e-Tip of the Week
035: Take the Time to Plan Outcomes before Activity

The language of project planning includes the nouns: milestones, activities, tasks, and durations. We use these terms like there is a well-understood common meaning for each term. We also use these terms like the relationship between the terms is equally agreed upon. Neither are the case. In spite of what you might find in a dictionary of project terminology, people use these terms differently, even in the same company and on the same project team. I won't take on the task of producing standardization. I'll leave that up to others. But I want to address a major problem with our current planning.

Time after time people talk about their planning in doing terms using verbs rather than in the terms of the outcome of their doing using nouns. When we plan we want to place our attention first on what it is we are promising to produce -- a product of our efforts. We can then get into what will it take us to produce that product. When we jump into the planning conversation saying what we will do first, then next, etc., we end up missing the key issues for satisfying our clients. Clients don't care about the doing. They care about the results (promises).

Start each planning session with the outcomes. Take all the time you and your team need to be clear about the conditions of satisfaction for the result. Check those outcomes with your client. Only then move onto how you will produce the result.

The Project Leaders' Studio™
©2004 Hal Macomber | weblog.halmacomber.com | e-Tip Archive | PDF | Submit Tip

Let's hear from you. Send me your tips on project management.

Monday, September 06, 2004
 
Learn from the LPS® Innovators

The Last Planner System® is routinely delivering projects on time and on budget. Want to know how? That will have to wait for another posting. But for today, I'll introduce you to Glenn Ballard and Greg Howell, the creators of the Last Planner System. They authored a 13-page paper for IGLC-11 sharing the current state of the approach and the open issues, An Update on the Last Planner.

  • Work structuring: linking scheduling and production control
  • Phase scheduling: providing goals for Last Planner
  • A list of improvements and recommendations that have emerged from theory and practice.
Emphasize learning (changes in PPC) rather than absolute values of PPC.

Throughout the years the authors and innovators have made numerous distinctions about projects that orient us to a new paradigm of project management. One important set of distinctions is how they view work structuring and project schedules.

"(S)chedules are products of work structuring that specify goals and the handoffs between specialists required to achieve those goals. Production control has the job of achieving those handoffs or initiating replanning should that prove infeasible."

Glenn and Greg are not speaking about structuring projects through the contracting process. They are pointing to answering the question, "How will we do this work with each other?"

The authors made five recommendations:

  1. Identify tasks and assignments that are either handoffs to someone else or that have implications for coordinating the use of shared resources.
  2. Make customer acceptance explicitly the measure of release.
  3. Emphasize learning (changes in PPC) rather than absolute values of PPC.
  4. Incorporate linguistic action and reliable promising.
  5. Measure PPC against planned day (versus week) for release.

And they posed five questions:

  1. Should work groups (squads, gangs, crews) meet daily to align assignments, identify make ready actions needed within the day, and identify problems requiring replanning?
  2. How far in advance should commitments be made?
  3. Should multiple levels of commitment be recognized?
  4. How to better assure that (the) Last Planner (System) is used within a distributed control system?
  5. Does application of the Last Planner system reduce the variability in duration of construction activities?

I am someone who helps teams adopt the LPS on their projects. So often people want to just use the six-week look-ahead plan and the weekly work plan. They think they are just using a different set of planning forms. The authors use this paper to show how the whole of the project planning and control approach changes. They also do something more important. They invite each of us to join them in research from the field as you use the last planner system on your projects. Want to learn from those who are already using the LPS? Join Glenn, Greg, and a group of practitioners in Park City, UT, September 14- 17, for the Sixth Annual Lean Construction Congress.

The Last Planner System™ (LPS) is a trademark of the Lean Construction Institute. The LPS is free for use. Join other users of the LPS at Planner2Planner.

Visit the Archives for more postings
 
Do your project on time and on budget by activating the network of commitment

Blogroll Me!

Reference Papers

Project Resources

Books

Top Blogs!

Bookmark These Weblogs

Blogroll Me!
Yahoo! Groups

RecipRoll

Do your project on time and on budget by activating the network of commitment   Links collected & maintained by BlogrollThis!   Searches performed by Atomz   Manage your subscriptions with Bloglet   Weblog Commenting & Trackback by HaloScan.com